AAPL Smartphone Shows the Way to Competitors
In yesterday morning’s Wall Street Journal, Apple (AAPL) has a full page ad advertising its #1 ranking in US business user customer satisfaction as reported by JD Power and Associates. In a near tie for second were RIM (RIMM) (BlackBerry) and Samsung (SSDIF.PK), with HTC (HTC), Motorola (MOT) and Palm (PALM) (Treo) posting below-average scores. Nokia (NOK) apparently had too few US customers to be measured.
The BlackBerry was tops this year and its score was essentially unchanged. The iPhone passed it, setting a new standard for customer expectations of a smartphone. (This news came out in early November but I didn’t see it at the time).
It’s clear that Apple did well because its competitors failed to deliver. 24% of users reported a software problem. Of those, 44% have to reboot their phone once a week, and 34% have an application error or freeze at least once a week.
Smartphones are small portable computers, with many capabilities and governed by software. It’s not surprising that the best results come from firms that understand software, manage the complexity and focus on delivering a quality user experience. Unfortunately for Apple, by showing the way to its competitors, it will help (some of) those competitors become more capable.C’est la vie (c'est la guerre).
Disclosure: None
Related Articles
|
Top Rated Comment Streams:
-
1.Hedged In660
- 2.
-
3.Smarty_Pants378
-
4.cos1000286
-
5.NOWHEREMAN275



This article has 6 comments:
-
Jon T
-
327 Comments
Dec 02 08:39 AMThe new Nokia N97 announced today is only slated for production in the second half of 2009!
What will Apple have done with the iPhone by then?!?
-
Buffeted
-
22 Comments
Dec 02 09:36 AMThe question is if it is a tecnological innovation alono we are talking about or a number of complex properies that make the iphone the success it is. I would argue the latter. Sure other smart phone makers like RIM have touch screen + scroll + other iphone design elements + the software looks like it was based on safari which was based on mac os etc. etc. But is that what is really going on behind the iphone's success? It seems to me there's some other level of complexity behind concept + innovation + contextualization. In the final execution, there is a kind of unity in the ipod itunes experience also in the iphone app store experience which will be a very difficult thing to emulate without any real vision or talent behind it all. It's must be like trying to make a Hitchcock film, when you're not Hitchcock.
-
brewer
-
416 Comments
Dec 02 10:53 AMAnd software development? Companies are making more off iPhone apps, at $5 a pop, than they were making selling boxed software for YEARS because so many more people are buying, and there is no marketing or distribution costs whatsoever. And Apple is profiting very handsomely, which, among many other things, is off the wall street radar even now.
-
kris23
-
90 Comments
My Website
Dec 02 02:05 PM-
mollytjm
-
323 Comments
Dec 02 03:36 PM-
neutrino23
-
39 Comments
Dec 03 05:46 PMYes competitors can try to copy some features but that is like driving by looking in the rear view mirror. Your future products are determined by what Apple brought out last quarter.
The one fly in the ointment could be the "good enough" effect. That is where people admit you have by far the better product but the cheaper, poorer one is "good enough" for them. As closely as Apple follows their customers I doubt this will catch them by surprise.